How much Policy does (not) matter?

07/05/2010 — Goran Buldioski on CEE policy processes

On Wednesday, May 5 the New York Times brought a very interesting opinion piece contributing to the debate on how much and if policy does matter*. In a style close to one of a Weberian disciple, David Brooks , NYT columnist found very interesting examples in comparing the life expectancy and other human development indicators of Swedes that migrated in the USA a century ago with those who stayed in Sweden.

According to his data, there was literally no difference in the way how these two groups (immigrants and those who stayed in Sweden) developed in the past 100-odd years within different societal systems. On the other side of the spectrum, he compared the same indicators between different ethnic groups that live in the USA, only to discover that for example life expectancy dramatically differs between different ethnic groups that live under same system. Not surprisingly he concludes that ethnic, social and regional differences account more for effects on life than policy could.

Regardless whether you agree or disagree with his arguments – not sure I subscribe to Mr. Brooks standpoint – the article launches a very interesting debate describing politics and governance relatively unimportant and with limited impact. Equally interesting and relevant are the comments published on the NYT web-page.

It will take you 5+5 (comments) min to read. While the column will certainly not bring a brand new wisdom , I hope it will make you think about how much does (or does not) policy make a difference in your country/region .